Which of the following is NOT a type of military leadership style?

In a military context, the leadership styles typically recognized are authoritative, transactional, and transformational, each with distinct characteristics. The authoritative style involves providing clear direction and establishing a strong control over the subordinates, which is essential in military operations where decisiveness is crucial. Transactional leadership focuses on the give-and-take between leaders and followers, utilizing rewards and penalties to motivate performance, which is prevalent in structured environments like the military where clear guidelines exist.

Transformational leadership is recognized for its ability to inspire and motivate followers to exceed their own self-interests for the sake of the team or mission. It fosters an environment of trust and collaboration, which is vital in military units requiring cooperation and dedication.

While charismatic leadership can certainly exist within a military context, it is not classified as an official leadership style in the same manner as the others mentioned. Charismatic leadership relies on the personal qualities of the leader to inspire others, which can sometimes lead to effective outcomes but is less structured and more reliant on the individual leader's personality. Thus, in the context of the question, not being a formally recognized military leadership style, charismatic leadership would not fit into the framework typically used in military science discussions.